Opinion

OPEN LETTER: Mam Baleka, Konakele, NIZOKWENZANI?

Unknown-1

Dear Mam Baleka

Recently, there was a motion of no confidence in the President of South Africa by the opposition parties. The biggest challenge was not the motion but the fact that the opposition sought to have the vote conducted in a secret ballot – a matter which ended in the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court placed the responsibility firmly in your hands as the Speaker. Although the court placed the responsibility in your hands they asked you to consider the issues very carefully before reaching your decision.

There were many views that were expressed on the matter including the media propelling a view that the majority of the country does not want President Zuma to continue serving as the president. Naturally,in a democracy you have opposing views and the media’s propaganda expresses the views of those who oppose President Zuma.

Now, Mam Baleka, we all know what would happen if the majority had lost faith in President Zuma, the National Executive Committee (NEC) would simply recall the President. This has not occurred, in fact the NEC has decided to continue supporting the President and instructed all members deployed to Parliament to do the same. Although the members of Parliament must abide by the Constitution of the Republic they are not directly voted into Parliament by the populace, they are deployed by their various parties and therefore their “personal conscience” must be balanced against the interests of the 11 million voters who voted for the ANC in 2014.

Mam Baleka, I am Zizamele Madlala, the spokesperson for the Black Empowerment Foundation (BEF). The BEF is an apolitical organisation that is the voice of the masses of black individuals within the Republic who find themselves in abject poverty, excluded from participating in the economy and benefitting from the natural riches of the land of their forefathers under the manipulation of a minority that has co-opted some of their leaders to continue and maintain their dominance.

Mam Baleka, prior to penning this letter, I once again read your statement in which you justified your decision to hold the vote by secret ballot. I noted that points 3, 4 and 5 seem to support that the vote should be held in secret. On the other hand, points 7,8,9 and 10 seem to support that the vote should be held openly. https://www.parliament.gov.za/press-releases/statement-speaker-national-assembly-appropriate-voting-procedure-regarding-motion-no-confidence-president I therefore cannot reconcile your decision and the basis thereof especially given allegations and rumours that are as follows:

  1. There were rumours that ANC MPs were bribed with monies up to R 2 billion to vote in favour of the motion.
  2. One individual is alleged to have received an amount of R 25 million.
  3. It is also alleged that you desired the motion to succeed because should the motion have succeeded the whole executive would be forced to resign and you would be appointed President until fresh elections were held.

The above allegations are very serious, Mam Baleka and I would like you to respond especially taking into consideration that you are also the Chairperson of the highest decision-making body of the ANC between conferences. The ANC was voted into power by 62% of the individuals who voted in 2014 and I do not concur with your decision especially in the context of point 13. The reasons for my disagreement are as follows:

  1. If the motion had succeeded, then the choice of 62% of the voters would have been subverted through manipulation of processes by the minority.
  2. The official opposition openly indicated that they desired regime change and the only fair way of determining what the populace seeks would have been to call for a referendum.
  3. The allegations of MPs being bought are very serious and it is essential for MPs to be accountable for the decisions they take on our behalf.

Finally, Mam Baleka, as the Chairperson of the ANC and a disciplined cadre, I am certain that you support the principles of democratic centralism. There are members of the NEC that have openly defied the positions of the ANC and have spoken on opposition platforms attacking the very ANC that they are meant to serve and protect. This includes the chairperson of the National Disciplanary Committee. The following questions arise:

  1. What are you going to do about it?
  2. This action has opened a Pandora’s box and from here on, we shall always face the risk that the will of the people can be subverted by people seeking to further their own ends. How will you be addressing it as the leadership?
  3. The constitution of your organisation is very clear and states the following:

“25.3 Any member, office bearer or public representative who fails, refuses and/or neglects to abide by the provisions of the Constitution of the ANC, its Standing Orders, Rules, Regulations, Resolutions and policies adopted or made in terms of the Constitution shall be liable to be disciplined in terms of this Constitution.

“25.4 The ANC shall have jurisdiction to discipline any member, office bearer or public representative for committing any act of misconduct as contained in Rule 25.17 below as a member of the ANC and/or by virtue of his or her contract of deployment and/or by virtue of his or her membership of any of the structures of the ANC.”

“25.17 The following conduct by a member, officer bearer or public representative shall constitute miscon­duct in respect of which disciplinary proceedings may be invoked and instituted against him or her:

“25.17.3 Failing, refusing or neglecting to execute or comply with any ANC Policy, Standing Order, Rule, Regulation or Resolution adopted or made in terms of this Constitution or breaching the provisions of this Constitution;

“25.17.4 Behaving in a manner or making any utterance which brings or could bring or has the poten­tial to bring or as a consequence thereof brings the ANC into disrepute;”

“25.17.9 Participating in any organised factional activity that goes beyond the recognised norms of free debate inside the ANC and which threatens its unity;”

“25.17.16 Prejudicing the integrity or repute of the Organisation, its personnel or its operational capacity by:

25.17.16.1 impeding the activities of the Organisation;

25.17.16.2 creating divisions within its ranks or membership;

25.17.16.3 doing any other act which undermines the ANC’s effectiveness as an organi­sation; or

25.17.16.4 acting on behalf of or in collaboration with:

  1. counter-revolutionary forces;
  2. a political organisation or party other than an organisation or party in al­liance with the ANC in a manner contrary to the aims, policies and objec­tives of the ANC;
  3. intelligence or the security services of other countries; or
  4. any person or group who seriously interferes with the work of the       Organisation or prevents it from fulfilling its mission and objectives.”

These provisions are very clear Mam Baleka, and as the Chair of the bodies that lead the ANC, what will you be doing about?

Mam Baleka, I believe that you are a seasoned cadre and I trust that you will exercise your discretion and leadership qualities to ensure that the movement that was set to liberate our people does not fracture into many pieces. Uwumama, kanti uma sekonakele sidinga omama ukuthi bayibambe ishisa, basivekele. Mam Baleka, ngivala ngokuthi, NIZOKWENZANI?

Yours humbly and faithfully

Zizamele “Zamo” Madlala

 

Tags
Show More

12 Comments

  1. It may sound ridiculous but there are enough grounds to call for impeachment of Baleka Mbete for lying to Parliament.

    You can’t as a speaker say “I don’t have the powers” for such and such and then go to court and say ” oh I know I have powers, I just didn’t know if I am compelled”

  2. It has been reported that Parliament is seeking legal opinion on a matter pertaining to those people who mislead Parliament to see what action can be taken against them.

    Baleka Mbete should be number 1 on that list for misleading Parliament.

    She stated on record that she does not have the powers to call for a secret Ballot however when she went to court it emerged that in fact she knew she had powers.

    She played this move anticipating that the opposition will take her to court as they had already been threatening to do.

    She calculated that if she looses the case, the Constitutional court may force her hand to a secret Ballot and the she will get what she wanted without carrying the Blame for calling a secret Ballot.

    She could have granted or refused the secret ballot without going to court.

    She could have ended it right from the beginning but she didn’t want to suffer the same fate as Max Sisulu.

    The reason for not doing so were based on her political calculations whose conclusions rested on the Constitutional court forcing her hand to a secret Ballot.

    When the Constitutional court refused to take the bait she took long again to judge the political tide and ultimately decided it’s time.

  3. Personally I told people that Baleka Mbete wants a secret Ballot before she even ruled so and here are the reasons I raised:

    In Parliament Baleka Mbete’s response to UDM is that SHE DOES NOT HAVE THE POWERS right.

    UDM goes to court and in Court Baleka Mbete’s counsil, Adv Marumo Moerane argues A DIFFERENT CASE IN COURT.

    In Court Moerane says ” …it is not our submission(in reference to whether or not Mbete has the powers to call secret ballot)… but our submission IS WHETHER OR NOT WE ARE COMPELLED TO”

    This prompted even Adv Dali Mpofu to ask “…so why are we here if Mbete knew all along that she has the powers?”

    Now the big question that still has to be answered is the very question Dali Mpofu asked ” …why are we here?”

    In answering that question you will be confronted with Mbete’s thinly veiled deception:

    SHE WANTED THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUDGES TO FORCE HER HAND TO HOLD A SECRET BALLOT SO SHE CAN SAVE FACE WITH THE ANC.

    She went to court prepared to lose the case and the only reason why she went to court to lose is that she wanted to benefit from that very loss.

    If we go along with the revelation that appeared in court that SHE KNEW ALL ALONG THAT SHE HAS POWERS BUT WAS NOT SURE IF SHE WAS COMPELLED, THEN THE QUESTION IS WHY DID SHE NOT EXERCISE THOSE POWERS WITHOUT LETTING THE OPPOSITION TAKE HER TO COURT?

    Parliament should in fact also look at the possibility of Mbete lying to parliament because in parliament she said she did not have powers only to go to court and argue a different case.

    If she knew that she had powers, why didn’t she use her powers and call for a secret Ballot or not call for a secret Ballot?

    Lastly, I would assume that a person of Baleka Mbete in her capacity both as Speaker of Parliament and ANC Chairperson at that time would have known about the secret Ballot that was called by the Speaker of Mogale city Municipality.

    If anything, the Mogale city Secret Ballot also indicated that the Speaker has powers and this happened long before she could be taken to court.

    So, without any shadow of doubt Madam Speaker had a vested interest in the outcome of the secret Ballot.

  4. @ Nombuyiselo the individual that you are talking about is the key and you must never be short sighted or driven by hate of that individual.Possibly you are not part of the 62% that voted the ANC in 2014.I am part of that 62% and hence feel that umama Baleka Mbethe made a mistake by trying to please the opposition together with yourself.Her decision nearly back fired because some of selfcentered MP’s and Zuma haters amper collapsed our government and the regime change would have occurred.One man and only one man could have also caused a “civil war”.The 08/08/2017 would have been catastrophic had the vote favoured the opposition.Just imagine those pro JZ who marched against the vote outside Parliament against those who marched for the vote and the same scenario in the other provinces.What would have happened!

  5. When talking of ANC all that you have said is appropriate but it’s an individual that was supposed to have been ousted then all your artitulations are out of order but in line with the ousting of this individual who has single handedly gone against all that you are pointing towards Baleka Zonke ezinto uzithethileyo ziyinyani qha uzijongise emntwini owrongo zijongise pha ku Zuma lo uzinyathele zonke yet you continue to support

  6. ANC people in Parliament have been influenced by the greedy bunch of South African Capitalist Party (SACP) and they have become so self-centered and heartless.
    How can a “Disciplined Cadre” sell-out 62% voters’ mandate in exchange of being an Interim President.
    That is betrayal of highest order.
    In support of a Regime Change Campaign (Coup), ANCs traitors were prepared to fail eleven million voters in exchange of dirty money from the West.

  7. I think the names of those alleged to have been bribed should be divulged. There will be denials and accusations which will create momentum in the spirit of accountability and transparency.

  8. Discipline cadre?? She didn’t show that instead she saw an opportunity to be at the helm…her decision was irrational cause the was information that there are members who are going to vote with the opposition

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button

For As Little As A Monthly Donation or Subscription of R150,00 You can Keep UnCensored Alive

For those of you who read UnCensored regularly, we implore you to donate. For those who donate, we thank you greatly. 

Learn More
Close
%d bloggers like this: