We need to decolonise our minds

By Pinky Khoabane

gybwmwlpiupm7xrnpa0hLumka Oliphant

There’s never a dull moment in our country – and this is putting it mildly given some of the tragic events which lay bare how far we are from being a nation – with shared values and goals – and the disrespect for the rights that are enshrined in our Constitution.

The issue of language and the right of all citizens of this country to choose their preferred language came under the spotlight yesterday when the spokesperson of the Department of Social Development, Lumka Oliphant refused to speak English in an interview with Xolani Gwala of Radio 702. She was dealing with the current crisis on social grants. Gwala ended the interview when Oliphant refused to speak in English.

In typical response of people obsessed by the language of colonialists, Oliphant was harangued. She was accused of being arrogant, stubborn and all sorts of other labels were piled upon her. The sad part was that it was mostly Africans on social media that were most offended by the spokesperson. One would have thought that the Africans – whose culture, traditions and languages had been eroded through colonisation and apartheid – would have been the happiest to see a fellow African assert themselves and their identity through their language.

Kenyan born, Ngugi Wa Thiongo, in his seminal essay, Decolonising the Mind, describes the extent to which English was revered: “In Kenya, English became more than a language: it was Slanguage, and all the
others had to bow before it in deference.

Thus one of the most humiliating experiences was to be caught speaking
GikuyU in the vicinity of the school. The culprit was given corporal
punishment — three to five strokes of the cane on bare buttocks — or was
made to carry a metal plate around the neck with inscriptions such as I AM
STUPID or I AM A DONKEY. Sometimes the culprits were fined money they
could hardly afford”.

He continues: “And how did the teachers catch the culprits? A button
was initially given to one pupil who was supposed to hand it over to whoever
was caught speaking his mother tongue. Whoever had the button at the end
of the day would sing who had given it to him and the ensuing process
would bring out all the culprits of the day. Thus children were turned into
witch-hunters and in the process were being taught the lucrative value of
being a traitor to one’s immediate community”.

Like the Kenyan children who had been taught to turn against their fellow pupils, the Africans were the most horrified by Oliphant’s choice of language. “How dare she on an English radio station,” they asked? “If she didn’t want to speak English she should have gone to one of the Black SABC stations”. Their rants continued the entire day and sadly deflected attention from the real issue of the social grants.

The problem with us – and here I mean Blacks and Africans in particular – continue to be obsessed with English and this is because part of inculcating the language was putting it up on a pedestal. And how the English achieved this is explained very well in Decolonising the mind.

“The attitude to English was the exact opposite: any achievement in
spoken or written English was highly rewarded; prizes, prestige, applause; the
ticket to higher realms. English became the measure of intelligence and
ability in the arts, the sciences* and all the other branches of learning. English
became the main determinant of a child’s progress up the ladder of formal

This phenomenon, tragically remains till today. The measure of advancement – school, workplace and many spheres of life depends on how good one’s English is and if you can speak it like the English or twang it like the Americans – all the better.

Oliphant was berated for speaking isiZulu on a supposedly English radio station but the driver who put a woman in a cage at the back of his bakkie spoke Afrikaans in an interview on the same Radio 702. There was absolutely no outcry on his choice of language. In fact Eusebius McKaiser, who conducted the interview interpreted and summarised what the man was saying. Not our African brother, Gwala. His mind is so colonised that he’s well aware of the “punishment” that comes with espousing his language. He knows it could be so costly as to lose him his cushy job at the radio station. So what does he do? He not only shuns his language but creates an incident that seeks to ostracise the African who dares to speak to him in her language on an English radio station.

There is much for the African National Congress to learn from the Afrikaaners. They fought the English language and within the same time that we’ve had our democracy, they developed their language from a zero base to one which could be used anywhere and every level of academia.





Show More


  1. Dear Welile,
    You say the goverment that you voted for, vote for “has done Jack”? then why are you still voting for them. You have a choice remember? You could vote for the National Party oops … The Freedom front… my apologies, I meant to say the DA you know… I mean who knows? They might not dissappoint you at all. Pinky, why do you even respond to this person? Welile makes me so sad… On a Friday nog al

    1. Dear Tols

      Imagine if I didn’t bother answering your comment. WE must learn to agree to disagree.



  2. Pinky asizwani nakancane uyabona manje ungibiza ngamagama,angizange ngikubize nganhlobo thizane.Awuyizwa lento engiyichazayo.

  3. Stop over talking,overanalyzing and being philosophical about this language issue in South Africa.My government that I voted for has betrayed me for far too long.Languages esintu are still not in schools(being a third string language of choice is criminal to umuntu onsundu).If Lumka had been invited on Venda,Shangan or Tsonga what would have happened.Don’t be naive to defend her,uyadelela losisi.She had spewing english in all interviews she had conducted but all of sudden her African voice came alive.Blame the ANC I vote for and voted for.There’s no black history,forget South African just black history and languages.Don’t over over things,Our Land Our History it’s in our hands but have not done jack.Politicians will tell lies that it takes time,AYIKHO LEYONTO.BAYAVILAPHA,AMAGWALA AND SEBESUTHI BONA.Don’t just that woman’s behaviour,her job is spokesperson and that entails respecting the platform you agreed to be on.

    1. Dear Welile

      You clearly have no respect for the opinions of others including their rights – the point I make in the first paragraph of the article.

      What our government needs to teach you is the Constitution. Lumka can speak whatever language she wishes including isiZulu and English – her right is protected in our Constitution. You choice of words – “bayavilapha” – when a pot calls the kettle black.

      By the way, I have every right to philosophise if I so wish – again, freedom of speech – but I doubt you grasp these kind of concepts.



  4. Hope your readers are not so stupid as to believe you stories designed to divide and concur! The irony is so blatant, you are manipulating them by using the language of the colonialists!!! Your probably wear their clothes, ride in their cars, eat their food that you buy in their shops, watch their TV and movies!!! What a joke!

    1. Dear Spockzie

      The business of communication is meant to persuade and concur people to your side. Even you are trying to divide me from “my readers” and try and get them to your side of thinking.

      The UnCensored reader is very sharp. They can make up their minds.

      South Africa has 11 official languages, none is above or should be above the others. I choose to speak any language I like and I write here in English. When I decide to write in African languages that too will be my right which is enshrined in the Constitution.

      Kindest regards

      Pinky Khoabane

  5. Lumka has set the tone, we MUST follow suit and re-assert ourselves. We viva her and our African languages!

    1. Yes, we must speak whatever language we please. I look forward to the day when we begin to write in Vernacular alone.



  6. Interesting is that under Lord Charles Somerset during the early eighteen hundreds, after the arrival of the British settlers in the Cape, Somerset introduce legislation to change the Cape into little London by change even the language to English. The so called afrikaners fled from the Cape in a movement called The Great Trek. A bit more than hundred years later the children of the very same people introduce apartheid legislation and force similar conditions in the black majority with Afrikaans. It is not a suprise that even in democracy and eleven official languages, that we still have a language of preference…English. The white impirialists will ofcause feel obligated to defend their colonialistic language. It is sad indeed to see black brothers and sisters taking their side as if the spokes person of the department of social development did a horrible crime by speak language of her preference. It is time that democracy get implimented in economy and languages as well. All eleven languages is equal to each other.

    1. I today was reading on how Afrikaans was developed. It is amazing and yet today we lambast people who choose to speak their languages.



Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button

For As Little As A Monthly Donation or Subscription of R150,00 You can Keep UnCensored Alive

For those of you who read UnCensored regularly, we implore you to donate. For those who donate, we thank you greatly. 

%d bloggers like this: