Why Money must be created by state and not private banks

By Redge Nkosi – He’s the Executive Director and Research Head at Firstsource Money


Paper and coin money as we know it, is but one leg of broad money. Most of us use the word money to denote the currency notes and coins in circulation, yet these constitute about or less that 5% of the total money, depending on the jurisdiction. This is government created money, through the reserve bank. Read less
The other money is created from debt contracts (credit money or loans) between banks and borrowers. This money is then transformed into public money via the link banks have with reserve bank.New money is thus created through loans given to borrowers as deposits in the hands of borrowers. Banks do not necessarily intermediate between savers and borrowers, as postulated by the Financial Intermediation Theory and the Fractional Reserve Theory (they don’t necessarily lend money that is saved). Money created through this process of loans is spent out there as public money.It is this money (the +95%) that is created by banks from “nothing” or from “thin air”, ex nihilo. But what does all this mean in real life? As an example, the mortgage bond you have with your bank is money the bank lent you that was just created by way of a book entry. It is not that the bank sweated for it, yet you are charged interest and they resposses your property should you fail to honour the debt contract. This is true for any other debt contract you enter into with your bank. For both individuals and companies, private banks engage in this sort of money creation from thin air. Furthermore, banks can chose who to lend, thus having given themselves the power to allocate or not allocate this precious resource. And since banks are motivated by profit, credit allocation can only be to those they deem fit, naturally not in the public interest. As we have noted in the recent past, this power has been used by banks despotically and sometimes to the detriment of the entire economy.Recent cases of banks defrauding the general public with a view to maximising their profits are too many to count. Why should this right to create money be exclusively given to very few institutions? Why have this and other governments (actually parliaments) franchised out the production of money to very few institutions, yet the proceeds of such a franchise do not accrue to the people?

MONEY AND DEMOCRACY? Since the abandonment of the gold standard and the Brettonwoods system in early 1970s, there has been unprecedented expansion of finance as a result of the conversion of these billions upon billions worth of debt contracts into currency. And with it has been the expansion of power, corporate or personal by those that have acquired the right to create money. But also, modern capitalism is finance based, hence the term financial capitalism. Capitalism, especially this type of capitalism is a great source of power, perhaps differential power. Crucially, in modern democracies, whoever has the power to create and control money has the power to direct affairs of the nation. Yet, this power is outside democratic control. Where affairs of any nation are in the hands of powers outside democratic control, it is the interests of those powers that will be served. There can be, and are deleterious consequences that result from this private control of key lever of economic growth and equity. South Africa and Africa have for far too long been controlled from without. If from within there are yet non democratic powers that control the allocation of resources, there can never be any realistic chance to change the economic and social fortunes of the citizenry. It is for these and many other reasons that we say, lets remove the power to create money from private banks to the people, so that the nation as a whole can benefit from this act of creating money.

The article was first published on www.firstsourcemoney.org.

About First Source Money.

We are an economic policy research and advocacy team that campaigns for the replacement of the current moribund economic policies, especially the monetary and banking ones, with those that engineer equity, inclusive growth and sustainable development.

Show More


  1. Why not go public with this advocacy? Campaigning aggressively how ordinary people can create their own money. Remember not many people have access to the internet like me. Unless, off course, this is propaganda for certain individuals to hijack Treasury.

    1. Mama Nomsa, the article says government and not ordinary people can create money? It is also online and has several branches in South Africa and has international contributors. That is public albeit that it does not go to the masses on the ground.

      I would challenge you to think why it is I dont have a newspaper as a way of accessing the majority? I leave you to think about money, why media and newspapers are in the hands of a few – those who have funds.

      I ask you to think why people whose ideas dont serve those with money will never see the light of day.

      Hopefully, when you have thought through these questions, you will answer you question.

      I hope you peruse most of the articles we write here – they dont feed you with the stereotypical view of the world. Not easy but we welcome your presence.

      Thank you.



      I ask you to peruse some of the articles we write here – we challenge you to think what would happen in the world if you were not fed the messages which you have become so accustomed to that you think that is the NORMAL way of life.

      It’s a challenge….

      By the way, the Treasury has long being hijacked. Open your eyes and ears Mama. Nice to have you on UnCensored.



  2. The commercial banks work by way of a Pyramid Scheme, one which is deceptively legal – although if you or I, or any business or government tried this, we would be jailed for fraud, on the other hand the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) is a giant Ponzi Scheme of the greatest magnitude, yet very few people understand that the SARB is privately owned, which means calling it “South African…” is misleading on its own;

    It is interesting that former South African Finance Minister Trevor Manuel joined one of the notorious banking families in world, the Rothchild: “Rothschild is pleased to announce the appointment of Trevor Manuel as a senior adviser to the group world-wide and deputy chairperson of Rothschild in South Africa with effect from 1st October 2014,” chairperson David de Rothschild said in a statement. Banks are very unduly powerful, this is among the reasons as to why Pravin Gordhan is dubbed: “The Untouchable”.

    Lastly, the very same banks do not you & me that the most societal ills, e.g. poverty, unemployment, etc. are the “projects” created and sustained by the same banks. Henry Ford was heard unknowingly spitting the following words: “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button
%d bloggers like this: