De Klerk would use death of apartheid operative killed by colleagues to blame ANC: Ahmed Timol Inquest

deklerk10a

By Pinky Khoabane

deklerk10a

FW De Klerk – “The Unconvicted Murderer” according to Eugene de Kock

The second sitting of the inquest into Ahmed Timol’s death stands as a stark reminder of the inhumanity of apartheid and the level at which the murders were sanctioned. This comes at a time when those implicated in the mass murder of Black people opposed to apartheid are being portrayed as today’s voices of morality. Roelf Meyer, the man who together with Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa carved our Constitution and F W De Klerk, the last apatheid-era president and Nobel Peace Prize laureate who has joined the regime-change campaigns said to SAVESA, are mentioned in the chilling testimony of a campaign involving murder, disinformation and propaganda to stop the liberation movement at all costs.

b1cb97300086443281c2c5f5b20f42ff

Roelf Meyer – Black-on-Black Violence his brainchild

“Black on Black violence was the brain child of Roelf Meyer,” said Apartheid’s operative Paul Erasmus who was a member of the security branch for 17 years. He was giving testimony at Timol’s inquest yesterday. He says there was a strategy of fabricating stories to suggest that murders were as a result of factions among Black people when they had been fuelled by the Nationalist Party (NP) government. Security officers attended courses on black-on-black violence, he said. Colonel Eugene De Kock was responsible for gun-running in Kwa-Zulu Natal as part of the campaign. The perception created, he claims, was that the NATs could do business with the Zulus and no one else.

In another explosive piece of testimony he said once the security police thought he knew too much and thought he would talk, there was an instruction to have him, his wife and children killed. De Klerk would then blame the ANC and accuse it of not being able to control its Self Defence Units (SDUs), he claimed. De Klerk would tell the world that the ANC had killed a young soldier with his beautiful wife when the truth was that the security police had killed their own.

Erasmus joined the police after matric, in 1975 and became deeply moved by the 1976 uprisings and was motivated to see “what was behind the carnage”. He painted a complex, devious “ballooning” campaign of grotesque state corruption in the battle against the liberation struggle. He spoke about a campaign of misinformation and propaganda with the ultimate goal to carry-out a strategy of deception. They used a range of activities which included putting up graffiti, painting paint remover on vehicles, use of stink bombs, teargas, blackmail, assault, bricks thrown through windows, firing shots at houses, arson, petrol bombs at houses and vehicles. With a little chuckle, he reminded the court that they also blew-up houses and cites COSATU House which was bombed in 1987. A year later, Khotso House, the headquarters of the South African Council of Churches (SACC) was also bombed. The blasts were led by de Kock who received his instructions from then Minister of Law and Order Adriaan Vlok, who confessed at the Truth and Reconcilation Commission (TRC) that he had received the instruction from then State President P W Botha.

Spreading disinformation about an individual being a terrorist and causing him to be attacked was part of their campaign. As part of the strategy to instil fear among citizens, they used bomb threats and bombed shopping centres and movie theatres. The former security officer predicted that 60% of the explosives in Johannesburg originated from Johannesburg security branch and not the “terrorists”.

Room 1026 John Vorster Square

The notorious 10th floor at John Vorster Square was where  apartheid’s most grotesque violation of human rights occurred. Room 1026 was called The Truth Room. There was an expectation and aura that if you went to the 10th floor or the Truth Room, you would be severely tortured.

This is where the security police “broke people” – a point at which the detainee confessed, participated in the court case and was willing to finger his/her accomplices during the trial.

Breaking meant generating “total fear”. Sleep deprivation – keeping detainees awake for days – was a regular practice. There was a roster drawn-up for interrogators to keep the detainees awake. They would move detainees frequently, blind folded, as they moved them from one office to the other and through the corridors of John Vorster Square. It was part of disorientating them, he explained.

Electric shock practice was used extensively, from branch level right upto John Vorster, the apartheid operative said. In some instances they refined the practice to inflict the highest level of electrocution. He said they would dip cotton wool in water and attach it to the electrodes and put them in someones ears, around the testicles or around the tongue.

He said they were given carte blanche to use any method to silence opponents of apartheid. A retired advocate who practiced during the 1970’s testified that he saw a body flying past a window at John Vorster Square on the day Timol was killed.

Apartheid’s security branches had an expansive network of people whose job was to cover-up police brutality and murder. Each branch had a resident sweeper, Erasmus said. The job of this person was to conceal evidence and ensure false evidence was led in  court. If police were accused of any wrongdoing, the resident sweeper would be brought in to ensure the police escaped prosecution and the reputation of the police would remain intact.

De Klerk has constantly denied knowledge of these atrocities. In 1996, he said the NP was itself shocked at the evidence of inhuman deeds and cold-blooded killings unfolding before the TRC.

“We cannot condone or align ourselves with some of the things which have been done.” De Klerk reiterated that he had not been involved in such acts. “I continue to deny knowledge and participation in decisions to commit serious violations of human rights, such as assassination, murder and rape.

“There was never a grand conspiracy in the NP government to go on a rampage of killing and murder.”

But as has often been shown in testimonies by other apartheid operatives in their applications for amnesty, De Klerk has been fingered. Vlok implicated him in the death of five boys who were killed by a hit-squad while sleeping. De Kock claimed he had evidence of De Klerk’s knowledge of military hit squads and called him the “unconvicted murderer”.

Timol Inquest continues…

8 Comments on "De Klerk would use death of apartheid operative killed by colleagues to blame ANC: Ahmed Timol Inquest"

  1. sipho sithole | July 25, 2017 at 5:39 pm | Reply

    Nuremburg the whole lot and bring back the death penalty just for them

  2. Senzangakhona Buthelezi | July 25, 2017 at 5:49 pm | Reply

    To all those, whose memory lapses have become common cause.
    That the unbearable pain that multitudes of our people have suffered at the hands of (now) contemporary agents of morality and democracy defenders, has been effaced from their minds.
    And have had themselves convinced that all things today happen by themselves and that all those who tell tales of sorts with intent to discredit the current government, its seating President and the ANC movement are all upright citizens!
    This inquest shall deflate this ignorance!

    I ponder, would these agents, with such impeccable misinformation skill sets put them to wader and let them lie dormant while State Power is once more on the offering?

    • Pinky Khoabane | July 25, 2017 at 9:25 pm | Reply

      Dear Senzangakhona

      I was impressed by the level of the propaganda I must say. As you put it – impeccable. It is no wonder we remain blind to the truth and have gone to the extent of denying our lived realities. The De Klerk machinery worked with newspapers, front companies and manufactured labour movements. It therefore makes sense when one looks at the various manufactured narratives splashed across commercial media.

      I wish our government had a third of the propaganda skills employed by these people.

      Kindest

      PK

      • Senzangakhona Buthelezi | July 25, 2017 at 11:53 pm | Reply

        Dear PK

        I find the hurt that these revelations evoke so poignant, and hard to endure.
        Not only the historical events, but largely those of today. That some whom we have once held in high regard, and considered champions of our revolutionary cause, today find it perfectly correct and dignified to dine at the same table with the very De Klerk and his constables, and that in their self-importance as they seek political resuscitation and relevance collaborate with murderers!

        As the Inquest unfolds, we shall yet again witness these skills of misinformation in full display as, I’m certain, the agents will pull all tricks of their craft to character assassinate the likes of Paul Erasmus in attempts to silence them.

        Regards,
        Senzangakhona

        • Pinky Khoabane | July 26, 2017 at 9:34 am | Reply

          The machinery is already in full swing – not as yet in the form of Paul Erasmus’s character assassination but rather on the omission of any mention of De Klerk in the inquest. You will see that there’s absolutely nothing in the papers. It is therefore our role to bring the atrocities to the fore and remind South Africans who the murderers are.

          Yes it is indeed painful to relive what happened to Black people in this country in their quest for nothing else but Freedom. But it is devastating that people like Thabo Mbeki, who we so respected, would think of resuscitating his career through endorsing the butchers of our people.

  3. sipho sithole | July 26, 2017 at 10:26 am | Reply

    The only only thing the future generation will know about De Klerk is that he is Nobel Prize laureate while the likes of Pres Zuma will be known as corrupt

  4. Perhaps one of the biggest tragedies the new Government inherited was total wipe out of intelligence data which could aid in identifying who was in bed with the Apartheid Government.

    What if those we think are shifting now have in fact never been part of us right from the beginning?

    This deliberate destruction of files in 1993 by NIS made the new ANC Government to ride blind into Democracy. Critical evidence went up in smoke that could aid in unmasking the atrocities committed and who gave the order.

    You have people who are highly trained in staging fictitious acts and who are trained in the arts of framing others roaming the streets of South Africa having gotten away with so much murder in the name of TRC and we wonder how crime continues to be a moving target in this country.

    My former Teacher who used to call soldiers when students protested during the 80’s mysteriously rose to the position of ANC provincial Secretary.

    Let the truth out

    • Pinky Khoabane | July 27, 2017 at 8:25 pm | Reply

      Kobedi, it sounds like your teacher was an Askari. But what the heck, if De Klerk can get a Nobel Peace Prize for his killings, your teacher’s deeds paled in comparison. Let him be the President of the ANC if he wishes.
      Yes it may be that a lot of information was shredded but the biggest deceit was the TRC. We heard of the atrocities but had sold out at CODESA and these murderers didn’t even need to ask for forgiveness. The security police that applied for amnesty and didn’t get it still run lose today instead of being in jail.
      Companies that assisted and benefited from apartheid didn’t have to pay a penny thanks to former President Thabo Mbeki. The ANC govt must accept full failure in dealing with apartheid atrocities. We like to say they were “outsmarted” but when you see how Mbeki cronies have benefited from BEE, you see he sold out. Simple and Period.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*