Zuma Exit, Barrage of Fake News & Journalists Defending The Fake

Unknown

By Pinky Khoabane

Unknown

PRESIDENT Jacob Zuma’s exit has exposed the shoddy standard of journalism in South Africa. Journalists’ code of ethics – accuracy, fact checking, balance, and fairness – have all been thrown out of the window in  the desperate attempt to be the first to break the story – whatever the agenda of the day may be. The Economic Freedom Fighters’ Julius Malema has become the source of the Zuma Exit stories, with journalists camping on his Twitter account for whatever juicy stories he spews. His opinions are not checked for factual accuracy and his motives not scrutinised. His word has become sacrosanct. More depressing than the shenanigans around the exit itself or non-thereof, is the confirmation of pack journalism by one Pieter Du Toit in a Twitter spat between Parliament’s spokesperson Moloto Mothapo and him and another journalist.

In a desperate attempt to sway news and manipulate the views of citizens, the past week has been about a barrage of fake news – with the African National Congress (ANC) and some of its structures like the Mkhonto We Sizwe Veterans Association (MKVA) and government spokespeople having to issue rebuttals which have in rare occasions, been followed by media retractions. From speculation about when Zuma was resigning and his demands, to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s state visit and Zuma’s poisoned liver, fake news has been the order of the day!

But one conversation that caught my interest was one between Mothapo and two journalists on the subject of a clear lie that ended as a news report.

Yesterday, Mothapo issued a statement refuting an article about an alleged decision by Speaker of Parliament Baleka Mbete with respect to the EFF’s demand that the motion of no confidence in Zuma be brought forward.

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 6.59.36 AM

“Reports that Speaker has rejected EFF’s request for the No Confidence Motion to be scheduled earlier than 22 Feb are fake news. Speaker has not responded yet, but she’s treating the matter with urgency. She will reply soon”.

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 7.02.07 AM

“It’s not fake news. It was information given to us by an EFF MP and the party’s spokesperson Mbuyesini Ndlozi. Your comment is irresponsible and unwarranted,” retorted Du Toit. Well, what of that requirement in journalism that the other party must be consulted before an article is published – right of reply it’s called?

SABC’s Sherwyn Bryce-Pease couldn’t be left out of the conversation, he was clearly what young people describe as “catching feelings”.

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 7.07.52 AM

“Fake news” is the intentional aim of misleading. Where the intent is to manipulate the facts for whatever ulterior motive. Let’s be careful when we use that term. It’s undermining journalism everywhere”.

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 7.08.02 AM

“What do you call publishing of inaccurate information attributed to a source without first ascertaining with that source? Isn’t it what undermines journalism everywhere?”

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 7.12.29 AM

“We, as did other media, quoted the EFF’s Mbuyiseni Ndlozi, who is part of the opposition driving this issue. Is he therefore lying?”

How shoddy. As I’ve said above, the opinion of Malema is not questioned and here Du Toit confirms exactly that. Despite the no confidence campaign being waged by several opposition parties, only Ndlozi’s side had seemingly been used in the article. Journalism’s code of ethics prescribes that several sources be consulted on a story and this fake news illustrates the importance. Du Toit would have had to speak to one of the other members in the opposition to corroborate what Ndlozi said and then give Mbete the right of reply.

He also confirms a very dangerous practice in South Africa’s journalism – pack journalism which is news reporting in which reporters from different news outlets collaborate to cover the same story from same sources and from same angles, leaving news articles homogenous. This is why you can wake up to find headlines which are exactly the same in most media.

Instead of addressing the gaping violation of the journalistic code, the journalists attempt to use semantics. “Call it something else,” Bryce-Pease pleads.

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 7.55.25 AM

“Call it something else, don’t misappropriate terminology. Call it incorrect, wrong, bad form, demand a retraction, correction but ‘fake news’ is something specific where the author’s aim is to misdirect purposefully”. 

Never in this conversation does Bryce-Pease condemn his fellow journalists on violating the code of their trade’s ethics. They used only one source and admit to it. Somewhere in the conversation, Du Toit retorts:

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 7.12.39 AM

“And maybe you could pick up your phone when we call for comment…” If this were the case, why didnt he posit this as his original excuse for only writing Ndlozi’s side of the story?

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 7.58.12 AM

“So if you believe the journalists here purposefully went about trying to skew the facts for some or other nefarious purpose, then call it fake news”.

Well let’s see where this idea ends when the truth is that either Nldozi or the journalists concerned lied.

The question that should rather be directed to Du Toit is why he didnt follow the rules of his trade, but such a question would not bode well for a discussion that seeks to show that there were no bad intentions in writing this inaccurate story and that the government spokesperson is over-reacting.

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 8.06.31 AM

“It’s actually astounding you’d gang up against me for merely raising an ethical issue u should be defending yourselves. Even EFF has confirmed Speaker has not responded”. 

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 8.20.17 AM

This is information that should not have come from a journalist, as it ruins the plot – the narrative held in the media that Mbete protects Zuma.

So where did Du Toit get the story? Is the publication that Mbete refused to respond to the EFF still a genuine mistake with no nefarious intentions? Look at what Du Toit says when confronted with the news that his story is a lie.

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 8.20.55 AM

“No use in engaging with you in public. Good day”. No apology then? No retraction?

Just Some Of The Zexit Fake News

Screen Shot 2018-02-12 at 9.39.07 PM

The Presidency has denied reports that a deal has been struck between the ANC and President Zuma to pave the way for his exit – describing it as Fake News

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 6.38.24 AM

Reports of President Zuma’s resignation dismissed as “fake news”

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 8.40.49 AM

So all the screaming headlines of yesterday Sunday newspapers about the NEC having taken a decision to remove Zuma by tomorrow were all fake news

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 8.42.37 AM

Last night eNCA’s site carried apparently #fakenews that Putin coming to visit Zuma tomorrow. Now they’ve taken down the story. But no retraction. Explain please 

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 8.40.21 AM

According to fake news by WMC media, Jacob Zuma was recalled last night and Nhlanhla Nene is the new chair of the board of Eskom. We in fiction land proper. They often mistake their wishes for reality.

4 Comments on "Zuma Exit, Barrage of Fake News & Journalists Defending The Fake"

  1. Greg Alexander Mashaba | February 13, 2018 at 11:17 am | Reply

    That is exactly why I too , very much like yourself , rarely pay much attention to what is said about our journalists. To say that the standard of journalism is South Africa is poor is to make an understatement.Our journalists must hang their heads in shame. They have not only done this once noble profession a disservice , but they have also contributed a lot to the erosion of informed and reasoned political debate in our country.

    • The state of this country’s journalism is of great concern. If the media cant hold those in power and the corrupt accountable by giving accurate information we are in trouble.I have not read a newspaper in probably ten years and I dont feel as if I’ve missed anything. This industry must hang its head in shame indeed Cde Greg. And this is not to say those politicians who leak information of confidential meetings are not as much to blame.

  2. Yo! We are in a serious crisis. This is journalistic anarchy; absolutely no regard for tenets and principles which ‘govern’ the profession. It’s disgusting to say the least. Will we ever encourage the coming generation to take journalism as a profession? The main culprits behind this, besides wmc are our captured comrades in and outside Parliament, and within our beloved movement which is now taking isiqondiso from the enemy. The question I’m asking myself now is, should this whole President saga be badly handled will I vote in 2019? Will I vote for my organisation which is bent on dismantling all, I mean all liberation gains and hand them over back to the enemy? Comrades please assist me!!!!

    • Pinky Khoabane | February 13, 2018 at 1:48 pm | Reply

      Cde Stalin, journalism as a fourth estate holding the rich and the powerful to account is dead. We need a fifth estate – the fourth has failed dismally and it is because it has always been portrayed as objective when objectivity itself is a myth.
      As for thinking of ditching the ANC, many people really feel hard done by. I would say you must look at the options – we need a strong credible opposition to keep the ANC on its toes – but think what happened at the municipal elections and what is happening at the DA run municipalities. Someone once said we ought to demand from the ANC that which we want and deserve and another dear friend who leads a political party in the opposition said the ANC is doomed. I cant help with your question.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*