Why Molefe is a threat

Pinky Khoabane argues Eskom’s Brian Molefe is rattling the white established coal mining sector….

Eskom’s CEO, Brian Molefe is under fire from Treasury and the chattering classes. What sin has he committed? He’s simply debunked the narrative associating black people with incompetence and corruption and for this he must be vilified.

More importantly, Molefe is not prepared to continue what the power utility’s chairman, Ben Ngubane, called the extortion of Eskom by white-owned coalmines which signed 40-year contracts during apartheid and at exorbitant rates. He’s rattling white monopoly capital and like everyone who has done so, he will be crucified. The top four coal suppliers are Anglo, Exxaro, South 32 and Glencore and we know, some weren’t able or were unwilling to meet their contractual obligations to Eskom. South Africans view these 40-yr contracts as legitimate. I would like to see their reactions if Molefe were to give any black-owned company a similar contract.

But let’s look at the figures. Exxaro for example. It benefitted from a 40-year cost-plus contract for supplying the Arnot power station in Mpumalanga. This means the taxpayer guaranteed Exxaro a fixed profit for decades instead of the hard work companies must put in to get a profit. Exxaro charged R1200 per tonne in comparison to Tegeta’s R475 per tonne saving the taxpayer over R1 billion per year. If Eskom had utilised services of other mining companies over the 40 years, it would have saved R40 billion.

Molefe has just been too good for Eskom and the country and frankly, the majority of white South Africans with their black lackeys-in-tow including the media are not happy. A performing Eskom also defeats the campaign to privatise state owned entities (SOEs) and on that level too, he must be harangued.

The terms of the $850 million IMF loan the ANC government took in 1993 included the privatisation of SOEs and commitment to abandoning nationalisation. There has been a concerted effort from the shrewd business people to privatise these assets but the labour movement has put pressure on the ANC not to do so.

The leadership of some of these entities have also sadly, given their enemies the weapon.

Under Molefe, the dreaded intermittent power cuts have come to a complete halt. The words “loadshedding”, “Eishkom” and all the jokes that had become the opening lines on every radio station and at every social gathering have come to an end

The Eskom standoff with one of its long time suppliers of coal, Glencore, speaks volumes and suggests some of the loadshedding may have been deliberate in order to force Eskom to pay it more for its coal.

Last year, Glencore tried to negotiate an increase from R150 per ton to R530 per ton for the supply of coal and Eskom refused on the basis that the Swiss mining and trading company had a contract ending in 2018, by which it had to supply coal to Eskom at the R150 per ton.

The power utility fined Glencore for not meeting its contractual obligations following four months of intermittent power outages. In what could be read as a subtle threat, Glencore said there would be more power outages if it didn’t supply the coal to Eskom. Following the fine, Glencore put its mine Optimum, which was supplying Eskom with the coal, under bankruptcy. Jobs would have been lost but the mine was sold to Tegeta Exploration and & Resources. The Gupta family owns 29% of this company. Tegeta is one of several companies which took-over the Glencore contract. It has now emerged that Eskom gave this company a pre-payment of approximately R500m. Is this a unique practice to the Gupta company? Eskom says it isn’t. It says it is used widely particularly in “large projects, coal mining contracts and emergency supply contracts”.

I have yet to read a rebuttal of this assertion. But we must ask ourselves why Tegeta was the only company targeted among the many smaller businesses from which Eskom now buys coal? The many questions of how the Guptas secured the money to buy the mine are not being asked of the others.

In a parliamentary debate yesterday, Molefe was quizzed at length about his relationship with the Guptas and like everyone who awaits criminal charges to be lodged against the them, he asked what it is they have done and why he cant do business with them.

3 Comments on "Why Molefe is a threat"

  1. Andile Tshuluba | September 1, 2016 at 2:11 pm | Reply

    This is an honest article.The targeting of Eskom by white monopoly capital demonstrates that South Africa is NOT captured by the Guptas;instead the country is captured by white monopoly capital which is also looting the countries SOEs in the name of “doing good” business in SA.

  2. Thank you for educating us

  3. BRICS and Guptas are the new kids in the block that are threatening the West and its allies in controlling SA.Many, if not All Governments states in the world are controlled by wealthy Businesses-Presidents are just CEOs of states.Look at the Power Elite- the USA Bilderberg Group; Council of Foreign Relation; Trileteral Commission and its members? Now the Rupert and the Oppenheimers- who benefit from these companies? Check the SAVE SA members-The very noise makers crying for spilted milk-why are they numb on what is recoverable from the white monopolies?
    PK,thanks for the enlightenment.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*